New budget includes a 2.25-to-1 ratio of spending cuts to new tax revenue; reduces Social Security benefits; cuts Pentagon by 1.6percent. (click to enlarge chart)
President Obama has released his fiscal 2014 budget proposal and emphasized his deficit reduction plans. Paired with deficit reduction already enacted, the president would reduce deficits by more than $4 trillion over 10 years with a 2.25-to-1 ratio of spending cuts to new tax revenue. Notably, he became the first democratic president ever to propose reductions in Social Security benefits by endorsing an alternate measure of inflation – known as chained CPI – to shrink cost-of-living adjustments for retirees. Nearly 90 percent of Americans oppose cuts to Social Security.
The president also set a presidential record for lateness, delivering his budget two months after the legal deadline of the first Monday in February.
Note: National Priorities Project has released a Competing Visions, a side-by-side comparison of the Ryan, Murray and CPC budgets to include highlights of the Obama blueprint.
Here are highlights of what the Obama budget contains:
Spending and Cuts
President Obama proposed a total of $3.8 trillion in new spending in fiscal 2014, an inflation-adjusted reduction of around 1 percent relative to 2013. The budget includes $166 billion over 10 years for infrastructure repairs and other job creation measures. It also proposes universal access to prekindergarten education, which would be funded by new taxes on tobacco products. Boosting job growth and expanding education funding are initiatives that enjoy strong support among the American public, according to opinion polls.
The president proposes repealing the automatic cuts of sequestration and instead pursuing other deficit-reduction measures, meaning that discretionary spending – both military and domestic – would receive fewer cuts than if sequestration remained in place in 2014. The budget would reduce agriculture subsidies and prevent individuals from receiving unemployment and disability payments simultaneously, among other cuts. The use of chained CPI in Social Security would reduce spending by $230 billion over a decade. And the budget includes $392 billion in savings from Medicare and other health programs, in part by raising Medicare premiums for wealthy retirees and negotiating for lower prescription drug prices. The budget maintains the expansion of Medicaid under Obamacare, a move supported by 52 percent of Americans, according to opinion polling.
The president projects $3 trillion in tax revenue in fiscal 2014, an increase of 12 percent relative to 2013. This is in part the result of a stronger economy and in part a result of changes to the tax code. The budget proposes limiting tax deductions and loopholes for the top 2 percent of income earners and includes a “Buffett rule” to require that millionaires pay a tax rate of at least 30 percent; together these tax increases would raise $580 billion over 10 years. Around two-thirds of Americans support higher taxes on the wealthiest earners. The budget would also make permanent tax credits targeted to low-income and middle-class families, including the American Opportunity Tax Credit, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and the Child Tax Credit.
The president does not propose raising new tax revenue from corporations, though such a move would be supported by around 64 percent of Americans. The president’s budget proposes closing some corporate tax loopholes and simultaneously lowering corporate tax rates, a move that would not result in any new taxes on corporations.
The budget includes $526.6 billion for the Department of Defense base budget, a figure that does not include war costs or nuclear weapon activities at the Department of Energy. That represents a 1.6 percent cut relative to current levels, and includes $8.4 billion for the purchase of 29 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters. The new budget does not specify funding levels for operations in Afghanistan in 2014. Fifty-eight percent of Americans would support substantial reductions in military spending, according to polls.
Tonight (Tues. April 9) at 8 pm on The Middle Ground, we'll talk to a team of activists lead by Coffee Party founding member Ryan Clayton about why they believe a Constitutional Amendment to overturn Citizens United is the best path forward. As we speak, Lawrence Lessig is drafting the language to be introduced in state legislatures across the United States, calling for an Article 5 Convention to address the issue of money in politics.
Current law, as decreed by the Supreme Court in the 2010 "Citizens United" decision, calls for unlimited spending by multi-national corporations to influence our elections, and thereby the laws we live by in the United States of America. The Court has said they would welcome disclosure laws, but Congress is too divided to enact such laws, in part due to cynical hyper-partisanship, in part due to the fact that members of Congress from both parties are reluctant to change a system that put them in power.
And yet, so many in Congress say they feel like hostages to fundraising. What can we do to rescue them from this corruption? Keep pressing for disclosure laws? Wait until the next election and "throw the bums out?" Or, if the problem is the corrupt system, and not the well-meaning individuals we send to Washington, perhaps our guests are right in saying a Constitutional Amendment is the only way to free the elected, and save the Republic.
Posted by Eric Byler · April 07, 2013 11:03 PM
· 1 reaction
Let us be clear about our choice. When we raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans, no one dies. When we cut Social Security and Medicare, people die. —Annabel Park
Since Friday afternoon, over a million people have seen this message from Annabel Park. It began on our Facebook page and spread throughout American when thousands of people began reposting the image on other pages. Keep sharing.
Let's get fellow Americans to wake up and fight to protect Social Security and Medicare (our lives, our health) from being used as bargaining chips in a callous political fight — not without hearing from us.
Day by day, issue by issue, We the People are proving that our voices cannot be drowned out by political advertising and political advertising disguised as news. Today, the majority of Congress is more likely to be voted out of office than advertised out of office. We've proven that, but we need to prove it again and again until we change the calculous by which Congress and the President make decisions.
In between election cycles, multi-national corporations and economic royalists expect to make decisions about our futures without hearing from the People. Social media is changing that. Let's not let them forget.
"It's a pathological, democracy-destroying corruption,because in any systemwhere the members are dependent uponthe tiniest fraction of us for their election,that means the tiniest number of us,the tiniest, tiniest number of us,can block reform."
Yesterday, TED released my TED talk — "We the People, and the Republic we must reclaim." At the same time, they released an eBook that I wrote to accompany the talk, "Lesterland: The Corruption of Congress and How to End It." If you've seen me speak recently, you'll recognize the roots in both. I worked incredibly hard to produce both, ("way too hard" my three year old tells me), and I am very eager to share them both with you today.
At our #Rootstrikers conference on the 20th in San Francisco, we'll talk about the next steps that this movement needs — with not just us Lefties, but also with many from the Right (including the co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots) as well. But right now, I would be grateful if you would just watch the talk, and share it. Both the talk and the book are freely licensed. In San Francisco, we will be releasing the code to encourage others to take it, and remix it. Now, please just consume — and if you like them, or think it would help, please share them both with your friends.
It has been a long road to this place. In the past five years, I've given hundreds of talks across the country — almost 100 last year alone, traveling 149,000 miles, and spending 107 nights away from my kids. But slowly, and finally, I think we're making progress. And with your help, I believe that we can kickstart the kind of movement — cross partisan, citizen based — that this fight will take.
I hope you can make it to San Francisco. But whether you can or not, I am really hopeful you will give me the 20 minutes it will take to watch this video, and share it broadly.
By handing out "Don't Do Koch flyers" (that look like Penny Savers) at supermarkets that sell Koch Brothers products, active citizens like you across the U.S. are offering fellow shoppers and fellow Americans the opportunity to buy alternative products instead. With this information in hand, we can avoid spending our hard-earned dollars on products that enrich these infamous oil barons who symbolize partisanship, greed, injustice, and the corrupting influence of money in politics.
As Sally writes in her latest email to volunteers, "Let people know that their product choices can help to keep us all from being played for fools by the Kochs." All it takes is you, a friend, and a printer to print out this downloadable flyer. Participants thus far have said the flyers are warmly received, and great conversation starters that lead to networking and deeper civic engagement.
Our other topics today will be our failure to care for our military veterans, and the cases before the U.S. Supreme Court that just might bring a measure of equal justice to America in the form of marriage equality.
Please call (646) 929-2495 at 1 pm ET (10 am PT) and add your voice to our show.
Charles and David Koch, billionaire industrialists, were two of the most prominent one percenters trying to buy the 2012 election. Their company, Koch Industries, gave over $5 million in disclosed contributions to candidates and PACs, along with who knows how much in undisclosed cash.
It has also spent a fortune in lobbying and issue advocacy, supporting such things as climate change denial, union busting, conservative curriculum in education and capture of the US Supreme Court. The Koch brothers are huge supporters of ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council, which gives corporations and wealthy individuals a way to develop laws and channel them directly into our legislatures.
The Big Apple Coffee Party, our local affiliate in New York City, has been handing out flyers in front of local supermarkets allowing shoppers to choose alternatives to Koch brothers products, and telling them why this is a vital choice. They've learned that shoppers really appreciate the information, and it’s a great way to start conversations that spread the word locally about what is happening to our democracy.
Now Big Apple Coffee Party has created this great downloadable toolkit with flyers and instructions for anyone to use and inviting us to help make this action spread across the country. Join the action here. The more people participate, the more impact it will have.
During the month of April, we hope to see volunteers across the country passing out flyers to let consumers act to take their democracy back.
Alarming emails have been hitting our inboxes, claiming the 2012 Farm Bill as “The Monsanto Protection Act.” But was it really?
Yes. And No.
Recently on LUNCH WITH LOUDEN, we took a look at the rocky road the 2012 Farm Bill has traveled and how it came to be known as the Monsanto Protection Act, which guarantees immunity to biotech companies that produce genetically modified organisms (GMO) that are routinely used in our food production industry.
According to legal experts, this provision “would create a precedent-setting limitation on judicial review” and is a “dangerous assault on fundamental federal and judicial safeguards”. (Food Democracy NOW!)
P.S. Citizens United did NOT benefit Coffee Party USA. Our average contribution is $30-35. Please support this grassroots organization in our mission to Connect Communities to Reclaim our Government for the People by becoming a Member or making a donation. Thank you.
Posted by Eric Byler · March 27, 2013 9:52 AM
· 2 reactions
I recently wrote that "Rebranding the Republican party" and voter suppression are incompatible. Last year, Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) seemed to agree. But this week he changed his mind about that to the surprise of many, including me.
In 2012, McDonnell was hounded by members of his party to sign a bill restricting the right to vote in a crucial election year. He did, but he also issued an executive order to protect citizens' right to vote by allowing other forms of identification, such as a utility bill, to be accepted. An estimated 870,000 Virginians do not have, and may not be able to afford the time and expense to acquire, a government-issued ID. McDonnell also ordered voter registration cards, which were also accepted at polling places in 2012, sent to every registered voter.
Republican lawmakers cried foul, and when the 2012 election produced zero cases of voter impersonation (success), but, a Barack Obama victory in the commonwealth (failure?), they passed a new bill to do away with the Governor's voter-protection measures.
Many expected McDonnell to veto the bill in order to uphold his authority and his legacy as governor, and, to position himself as a mainstream candidate, viable for higher office. Unfortunately, McDonnell has backed down, and on the last day he could have done so, signed the more restrictive voter ID bill into law.
In the face of a very expensive media campaign about voter fraud — which aired mostly on Fox News and other Republican media outlets starting in 2009 — majorities of respondents to polls say they support ID requirements to protect the integrity of our elections. But then we have the facts to deal with. For instance, the fact that there have been almost no documented cases of voter impersonation fraud, which is the only kind of fraud that voter ID laws could address. You are more likely to be struck by lightning than be a victim of voter-impersonation fraud. Meanwhile, the documented cases of actual voter fraud occur with absentee ballots, or in voter registration fraud such this case in Virginia in 2012. But bills that addressed real and actual problems with Virginia elections — such as long lines at the polls (see below) — could not make it through committees in the Republican-controlled General Assembly.
Reagan George, a Tea Party Republican and active proponent of voter ID laws in Virginia, acknowledged when we interviewed him that no actual cases of voter impersonation have been documented in Virginia. (If lawmakers asked for $2,000,000 of taxpayer money to address a problem, wouldn't you want to see at least one documented case of that problem before that money was spent? And that's just the price tag for the 2012 version of this law). But Mr. George said that voter-impersonation fraud might occur if we don't pass laws to prevent it: "My bank has never been robbed... does that mean the bank shouldn't have a vault?"
But that is assuming that stopping voter impersonation is the real intention. A more cynical intention might have to do with the fact that hundreds of thousands of American citizens and legal voters in Virginia, and millions across the United States, will have their voting rights systematically abridged by such restrictions, and, they are just the types of voters that Republicans would prefer to see discouraged enough that they might stay home. Consider this video about Augustine Carter, an 85-year-old woman who went through hell and high water in order to get a photo ID despite the fact that she had been voting in the United States for 60 years.
If the estimate of 870,000 Virginians lacking government-issued IDs is accurate, I doubt that many of them possess the determination that this woman did, hiring a genealogist and pulling census records from 1940 to prove her citizenship. According to the Richmond Times-Dispatch, lawmakers expect less than 5,000 people to obtain voter ID's in response to this law. Their expectation is my fear. Whatever the number is, most of these people will simply be removed from our democracy. Now that it is law, perhaps Ms. Carter's story will inspire a higher percentage of them to reacquire their right to vote. But if even one American citizen is disenfranchised to suit the electoral goals of a major political party, that is one citizen too many.
Story of America's interest in voting rights increased when Annabel Park and I witnessed and filmed the five-hour ordeal voters in Prince William County had to endure — as it happened, in the most heavily African American precinct in the most diverse district of one of Virginia's most diverse counties.
It's a shame that legislators in Virginia are so focused on fixing the non-existent, but thoroughly advertised "problem" of voter-impersonation fraud, but not preventing real and actual flaws in Virginia elections, like long lines at the polls. On the one hand, their action abridges the People's right to vote. On the other hand, their inaction abridges the People's right to vote. And in both cases, it's the same people who suffer, the same people who have always suffered when political outcome, not democratic principles, govern our approach to voting rights.
From Newtown, CT, Darren Wagnerwill make his second appearance on The Middle Ground, and his first since he launched the Newton Action Alliance. He is a former Deputy Sheriff who has become a leading voice on the issue of gun violence after he and his family were shaken by the Sandy Hook Elementary massacre.
From the Selma, AL, Chellette Henderson is a retired aerospace executive who has returned to her childhood home after her husband and her mother passed away. Having participated in the famous voting rights marches in Selma 48 years ago, she is getting reacquainted with Alabama after raising a family, making her career, and helping to establish MLK Day, in Mesa, Arizona. We'll ask the two of them share their views on issues such as gun safety, voting rights, and how to overcome cultural division.
We'll also ask Darren and Chellette to comment on each other's work, and give us their advice on how to be an effective and active citizen. Speaking of which, we're starting an hour early and ending the show promptly at 8 pm so our listeners can participate with Annabel Park and the Big Apple Coffee Party in a strategy call for the "Don't Do Koch" initiative which kicks off April 1st, helping consumers identify which products in their supermarkets enrich partisan-extremist oil barons Charles and David Koch.
Partner Spotlight: Public Citizen’s Sharehoder Actions This Monday at 10 p.m. Eastern Call (646) 929-2495 to listen & hit  to speak Or listen online live or later
The first in our series of Coffee Party Partner Spotlights, we’ll be joined by Kelly Ngo -- Legislative Assistant with Public Citizen's Congress Watch. While many are attacking the problem of Big Money in politics by working to overcome the Citizen’s United decision, Kelly is helping to lead a series of actions by Public Citizen -- one of the Coffee Party’s affiliated organizations on the Grass Roots Task Force. Public Citizen is calling for Starbucks and other corporations to adopt shareholder resolutions calling on these companies to refrain from all election-related spending. Starbucks already has excellent disclosure policy, but investors and good governance groups want the company to go one step further and take a real stance against corporate money in elections.
You’ll not only learn about the actions themselves, but how you too can get involved in this crusade against special interest money, the shareholders they hurt, and how you could be a victim of this abuse and not even realize it. Join political activist and Coffee Party board member host Dan Aronson listen in here, or better yet, call (646) 929-2495. And when you do, remember to Press  for Democracy.